Thursday, February 28, 2013
82% of unchurched people are "some what likely" to . . .
| ||||
Body Image - Tatoos: a skin-deep reflection
|
Facebook - how many and when
Facebook - who founded it and how many use it | |
|
The figure is as of September and was disclosed Tuesday in Facebook's quarterly earnings report.
Facebook also says it had 584 million active users each day on average in September and 604 million using Facebook from a mobile device each month.
Here is a look at how the number of active users at Facebook has grown:
1 million — End of 2004.
5.5 million — End of 2005.
12 million — End of 2006.
20 million — April 2007.
Here is a look at how the number of active users at Facebook has grown:
1 million — End of 2004.
5.5 million — End of 2005.
12 million — End of 2006.
20 million — April 2007.
Using YouTube
How to capture, download and use YouTube video | |
|
Facebook Abuse on its way down . . .
You Are Facebook's #1 Commodity | |
|
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
How important are small groups?
How important are small groups in student ministry – well, I think it is
so important that Im not sure it can be measured or articulated in a short
while. So, whether you are the youth pastor, small group leader or potential
volunteer candidate, I want to share with you a dozen benefits teenagers
receive from the ministry of small group leaders:
1.
They have another significant adult
caring about what they do and the decisions they make. I once heard Psychologist Dr. James Dobson
report that 40% of kids are born into homes with no father to mentor them,
correct them or cheer them on and that every ado adolescent needs a
“significant other” adult willing to journey with them for the sake of what I
call the THREE “C”s Challenging,
Correcting and Cheering.
2.
Youth receive weekly
encouragement to grow spiritually from
someone other than mom or dad. Let’s face it, there is only so much mom and dad
can say and only so long it will be heard before the ears of a teenager become
supersaturated with the do’s and donts during adolescent development. Small
group leaders bridge that gap for parents and in the cases where spiritual
parenting and modeling is absent, the gap they fill is quite significant!
3.
Small group
leaders provide an important support beam when hurricane force winds blow
through the life of a teen. An invested connected parent and youth leader simply
cannot meet the needs of enough students – they need help from committed small
group leaders.
4.
Youth receive
an encouraging word or a smiling face at sporting events or other type
activities. A caring presence from
non-relatives is a KEY player in keeping them on the right side of the road or
correcting their actions when needed.
5. Youth get to
connect with an adult who is truly excited to see them at church.
6.
Youth are
NOTICED when they are not present in small group and they respond positively
when they realized their presence is NOT Incidental or taken for granted.
7. Students
benefit from of the voice of affirmation – whether a text, tweet, facebook,
phone message or old fashioned snail mail note – they cant help but know invested
small group leaders care and will not give up on them.
8. Students need
a “neutral adult” for practical life
issues - being too close to the situation makes a parent vulnerable to
emotional rule. A small group leader can support the parents from one step
outside the boxing ring.
9. Only in small
group can a student find the connection deep enough to have a SAFE place or
person in time of need.
10. Youth are
accounted for in small group – from a practical management side, they are
noticed when present and when not present. Small group leaders provide the
ultimate management system for the youth ministry.
11. Only in small
group can spiritual truths be planted using the highest retention rate methods.
Its these teaching methods that provide future Holy spirit recall moments.
I love my kids
and no matter how old they get, they will still be my kids, but they were
blessed beyond measure to have caring, trained adults who coached them along in
small group strengthening what my wife and I wanted them to grasp. If you want
your students to become fully devoted followers of Christ INVEST in small group
and small group leaders.
Monday, February 18, 2013
The Rise of Extreme Tolerance
Many evangelicals once known for a very prudent and biblical approach to doctrine are fast becoming as doctrinally clueless as the unchurched people they are so keen to please. At least three decades of deliberately downplaying doctrine and discernment in order to attract the unchurched has filled many once-sound churches with people who utterly lack any ability to differentiate the very worst fast doctrines from truth. I constantly encounter evangelical church members who are at a loss to answer the most profound errors they hear from cultists, unorthodox media preachers, or other sources of false doctrine.In the church today, there is a growing reluctance to take a definitive stand on any issue. Discernment is frankly not very welcome in a culture like ours. In fact, the postmodern perspective is more than merely hostile to discernment; it is practically the polar opposite. Think about it: pronouncing anything "true" and calling its antithesis "error" is a breach of postmodernism's one last impregnable dogma. That is why to a postmodernist nothing is more uncouth than voicing strong opinions on spiritual, moral, or ethical matters. People are expected to hold their most important convictions with as much slack as possible. Certainty about anything is out of the question, and all who refuse to equivocate on any point of principle or doctrine are therefore automatically labeled too narrow. Zeal for the truth has become politically incorrect. There is actually zero tolerance for biblical discernment in a "tolerant" climate like that.
In the secular realm, postmodernism's extreme tolerance has been foisted on an unsuspecting public by the entertainment media for several decades. A plethora of talk shows on daily television have led the way. Phil Donahue established the format. Jerry Springer took it to ridiculous extremes. And Oprah made it seem somewhat respectable and refined. Shows like these remind viewers daily not to be too opinionated-and they do it by parading in front of their audiences the most bizarre and extreme advocates of every radical "alternative lifestyle" imaginable. We are not supposed to be shocked or notice the overtly self-destructive nature of so many aberrant subcultures. The point is to broaden our minds and raise our level of tolerance. And if you do criticize another person's value system, it cannot be on biblical grounds. Anyone who cites religious beliefs as a reason to reject another person's way of life is automatically viewed with the same contempt that used to be reserved for out-and-out religious heretics. The culture around us has declared war on all biblical standards.
Some Christians unwittingly began following suit several years ago. That has opened the door for a whole generation in the church to embrace postmodern relativism openly and deliberately. They don't want the truth presented with stark black-and-white clarity anymore. They prefer having issues of right and wrong, true and false, good and bad deliberately painted in shades of gray. We have reached a point where the typical churchgoer today assumes that is the proper way of understanding truth. Any degree of certainty has begun to sound offensive to people's postmodernized ears.
One young pastor told me he didn't like the authoritarian implications of the word preaching. He said he preferred to speak of his pulpit ministry as "sharing" with his people. He didn't last long in ministry, of course. But sadly, his comments probably reflect the prevailing mood in the church today.
D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones noticed the same trend several decades ago. His marvelous book Preaching and Preachers began by noting that modern society was becoming uncomfortable with the whole idea of "preaching":
A new idea has crept in with regard to preaching, and it has taken various forms. A most significant one was that people began to talk about the "address" in the service instead of the sermon. That in itself was indicative of a subtle change. An "address." No longer the sermon, but an "address" or perhaps even a lecture...what is needed is a chat, a fireside chat, quiet talks, and so on!1Lloyd-Jones was simply noticing one of the subtle harbingers of postmodernism's contempt for clarity and authority. A problem that existed in embryonic form in his era is now a full-grown monster.
At the "Emergent Convention" in 2004, a gathering of some eleven hundred leaders in the Emerging Church movement, Doug Pagitt, pastor of Solomon's Porch (an Emergent community in Minneapolis), told the gathering, "Preaching is broken." He suggests that a completely open conversation where all participants are seen as equals is better suited to a postmodern culture. "Why do I get to speak for 30 minutes and you don't?" he asked. "A sermon is often a violent act," he declared. "It's violence toward the will of the people who have to sit there and take it."2
Rudy Carrasco, a Pasadena-based Emergent pastor, agreed that preaching is simply too one-sided, too authoritative, and too rigid for postmodern times. "Every day, every week, there's stuff that pops up in life, and it's not resolved, just crazy and confusing and painful. When people come across with three answers, and they know everything, and they have this iron sheen about them, I'm turned off. Period. I'm just turned off. And I think that's not unique to me."3
Many in the church, caught up in the spirit of the age, think Christians should never take an uncompromising stand, should never argue about anything. We're not supposed to engage in polemics. I hear this frequently: "Why don't you just state the truth in positive terms and ignore the view you disagree with? Why not steer clear of controversy, forget the negatives, and present everything affirmatively?"
That ethos is why it is no longer permissible to deal with biblical issues in a straightforward and uncompromising fashion. Those who dare to take an unpopular stand, declare truth in a definitive way-or worst of all, express disagreement with someone else's teaching-will inevitably be marked as troublesome. Compromise has become a virtue while devotion to truth has become offensive.
But many of the issues being compromised within the evangelical movement today are not questionable. Scripture speaks very clearly against homosexuality, for example. The Christian position on adultery is not at all vague. The question of whether a believer ought to marry an unbeliever is spelled out with perfect clarity. Scripture quite plainly forbids any Christian to take another Christian to court. Selfishness and pride are explicitly identified as sins. These are not gray areas. There is no room for compromise here.
Nevertheless, I constantly hear every one of those issues treated as a gray area-on Christian radio, on Christian television, and in Christian literature. People want all such matters to be negotiable. And too many Christian leaders willingly oblige. They hesitate to speak with authority on matters where Scripture is plain. The lines of distinction between truth and error, wisdom and foolishness, church and world are being systematically obliterated by such means.
The world needs Christians who embrace an antithetical worldview, a biblical mindset that answers questions of truth and morality in terms of black and white. Why? Because there is no salvation without absolute, unshakeable truth. Compromising, changing, tolerant opinions don't provide answers for the "crazy and confusing and painful" issues that confront pastor Carrasco every day. Only truth saves and sanctifies and gives hope.
What's needed today is a generation of men and women who will take a stand on biblical truth. People like that fear the Lord, not men, and will find power and courage from the Lord to uphold His truth in an age of extreme tolerance.
Adapted from The Truth War, © 2007 by John MacArthur
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)